2025 • Journal Article
Evolving Critical Metal Systems: Hype Cycles and Implications for Sustainable Innovation
To achieve the transition to sustainable energy and mobility systems, we are relying heavily on critical metals. The sustainable extraction, use, and circulation of these materials is not straightforward as contestation over the social and ecological sustainability of these metals is characterised by so-called hype cycles of increased and decreased legitimacy. This impedes the energy and mobility transition. We propose and apply a novel approach using event graphs to assess critical metal systems as evolving socio-material systems, comparing three longitudinal cases (lithium, cobalt, tantalum). Our analysis leads to an ideal type hype cycle for critical metal systems. Our findings evidence the necessity for policymakers and industry practitioners to use approaches such as responsible innovation to ensure that the extraction, use, and circulation of critical metals does not undermine the transition to sustainable mobility and energy systems.
Bibliographic Record
- Volume: 17
- Issue: 6
- Pages: 2778
- Publisher: MDPI
- DOI: 10.3390/su17062778
Cite This Work
10.3390/su17062778
10.3390/su17062778Evolving Critical Metal Systems: Hype Cycles and Implications for Sustainable InnovationMahanty, Sampriti, Frank Boons, and Gavin D. J. HarperSampriti Mahanty|Frank Boons|Gavin D. J. HarperMahanty|Boons|Harper2025articleSustainabilitySustainabilityMDPI1762778
Crossref Verified
Synthesizing citation data...
Export to Reference Manager:
PlumX
PlumX Metrics are a comprehensive set of "altmetrics" (alternative metrics) that track how research, such as articles and data sets, is used, discussed, and shared online. They provide insights beyond traditional citation counts by tracking interactions across five categories: Usage, Captures, Mentions, Social Media, and Citations.
Scite.AI
Scite.ai provides a visual, real-time summary of how a scholarly paper has been cited, moving beyond simple citation counts. It classifies citations using AI to show if a paper is supported, mentioned, or contrasted, alongside retraction alerts, as well as showing the most common sections of a paper in which the paper was cited.
Dimensions
Dimensions shows the academic impact of a specific research output by highlighting both traditional citation counts and normalized, context-aware metrics.
Field Citation Ratio (FCR): Compares the citation count to other similarly aged publications in the same field. An FCR greater than 1.0 indicates above-average citations.
Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A metric that compares an article’s citation performance to that of others in the same area.
Altmetrics
Altmetrics complement traditional metrics by highlighting broader, faster, and more varied types of engagement.
Altmetric "donuts," provide a summary of the online attention and engagement a research output has received. The colors indicate the types of sources.
The Altmetric Score is a weighted count of the attention a piece of research has received. It measures volume rather than quality, highlighting how much conversation is happening, not necessarily whether that conversation is positive or negative.
Altmetric "donuts," provide a summary of the online attention and engagement a research output has received. The colors indicate the types of sources.
The Altmetric Score is a weighted count of the attention a piece of research has received. It measures volume rather than quality, highlighting how much conversation is happening, not necessarily whether that conversation is positive or negative.












































































