Skip to main content

Technology Roadmaps


Technology roadmaps are essential strategic tools that chart the course for future innovation and development within a specific field. They serve as a high-level plan, aligning short-term and long-term goals with specific technological solutions. By synthesizing the collective knowledge and vision of experts from academia, industry, and government, a roadmap provides a coherent framework that bridges the gap between our current capabilities and our most ambitious future aspirations. It identifies the critical development pathways, potential roadblocks, and key milestones necessary to turn bold ideas into tangible realities.

The true utility of a technology roadmap lies in its power to foster consensus and guide collective action. It is far more than a mere predictive document; it is a catalyst for focused research and development, a guide for strategic investment, and a foundation for collaboration. The process of creating a roadmap forces a community to ask difficult questions, prioritize objectives, and agree upon a shared direction.

The documents listed here are roadmaps that I have either edited or contributed to. They represent collaborative efforts, providing a structured vision to accelerate progress, mitigate risks, and ensure that research efforts are directed towards the most promising and impactful avenues. A common thread that runs through all of the pieces that I have worked on is desire to push towards more sustainable socio-technical systems, and embed principles of responsible innovation.

Ultimately, these roadmaps are expressions of our collective ambition to shape the future. They represent a commitment to moving beyond incremental improvements and tackling the grand challenges of our time. By defining the journey from the laboratory to society, we lay the groundwork for transformative breakthroughs that will define the next generation of technology and improve the world we live in. They are a testament to the idea that with a clear vision and a coordinated effort, we can intentionally build the future we wish to see.

Technology Roadmaps In Progress


Roadmap for a Circular Economy of Rare Earth Magnetic Materials

  • J.Phys. Materials
  • Institute of Physics Publishing (IOP Publishing)
  • Guest Editors
  • Allan Walton ⬥ University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
  • Gavin Harper ⬥ University of Birmingham, UK
  • Evi Petavratzi ⬥ Critical Materials Intelligence Centre, British Geologica Survey, Kegworth, UK
Link to Journal Website⬥ ISSN: 2977-3504⬥ Authors⬥ Articles

Published Roadmaps I Have Edited


Roadmap for a sustainable circular economy in lithium-ion and future battery technologies

  • J.Phys. Energy
  • Institute of Physics Publishing (IOP Publishing)
  • Roadmap Editors
  • Gavin Harper ⬥ University of Birmingham, UK
  • Emma Kendrick ⬥ University of Birmingham, UK
  • Paul Anderson ⬥ University of Birmingham, UK
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently the most widely used secondary batteries, end-of-life LIBs contain a large number of valuable parts, both environmental pollution and waste of resources can be caused once they were improperly handled. This special issue focuses on the latest progresses in recycling of lithium-ion batteries, including but not limited to the novel recycling technologies of various components in batteries, such as cathode materials, anode materials, current collectors, separators, electrolytes, etc.; advanced pretreatment methods of spent batteries (including rapid diagnosis, disassembly process, separation methods, etc.); material flow analysis, ecological environmental impact, economic analysis, etc. of battery recycling process. This special issue will provide important guidance for the construction of advanced battery recycling system.
Link to Journal Website⬥ 10.1088/2515-7655/acaa57⬥ ISSN: 2977-3504⬥ Authors⬥ 12 Articles
Live Article-Level Metrics
Altmetric
Attention
Dimensions
Citations
PlumX
Metrics

Technology Roadmaps I Have Contributed To


The Sustainable Materials Roadmap

  • J.Phys. Materials
  • Institute of Physics Publishing (IOP Publishing)
  • Editor
  • Magda Titirici ⬥ Imperial College London, London, UK
Over the past 150 years, our ability to produce and transform engineered materials has been responsible for our current high standards of living, especially in developed economies. However, we must carefully think of the effects our addiction to creating and using materials at this fast rate will have on the future generations. The way we currently make and use materials detrimentally affects the planet Earth, creating many severe environmental problems. It affects the next generations by putting in danger the future of the economy, energy, and climate. We are at the point where something must drastically change, and it must change now. We must create more sustainable materials alternatives using natural raw materials and inspiration from nature while making sure not to deplete important resources, i.e. in competition with the food chain supply. We must use less materials, eliminate the use of toxic materials and create a circular materials economy where reuse and recycle are priorities. We must develop sustainable methods for materials recycling and encourage design for disassembly. We must look across the whole materials life cycle from raw resources till end of life and apply thorough life cycle assessments (LCAs) based on reliable and relevant data to quantify sustainability. We need to seriously start thinking of where our future materials will come from and how could we track them, given that we are confronted with resource scarcity and geographical constrains. This is particularly important for the development of new and sustainable energy technologies, key to our transition to net zero. Currently ‘critical materials’ are central components of sustainable energy systems because they are the best performing. A few examples include the permanent magnets based on rare earth metals (Dy, Nd, Pr) used in wind turbines, Li and Co in Li-ion batteries, Pt and Ir in fuel cells and electrolysers, Si in solar cells just to mention a few. These materials are classified as ‘critical’ by the European Union and Department of Energy. Except in sustainable energy, materials are also key components in packaging, construction, and textile industry along with many other industrial sectors. This roadmap authored by prominent researchers working across disciplines in the very important field of sustainable materials is intended to highlight the outstanding issues that must be addressed and provide an insight into the pathways towards solving them adopted by the sustainable materials community. In compiling this roadmap, we hope to aid the development of the wider sustainable materials research community, providing a guide for academia, industry, government, and funding agencies in this critically important and rapidly developing research space which is key to future sustainability.
Link to Journal Website⬥ 10.1088/2515-7639/ac4ee5⬥ ISSN: 2515-7639 (Online) ⬥ 55 Authors⬥ 28 Articles
Live Article-Level Metrics
Altmetric
Attention
Dimensions
Citations
PlumX
Metrics

Met4Tech Circular Economy Roadmap Report for Lithium Ion Battery Materials

  • The UKRI Interdisciplinary Centre for a Circular Economy in Technology Metals
The CE model offers a sustainable alternative to the traditional linear economy by focusing on reducing waste and keeping products and materials in use for as long as possible while regenerating natural systems (Ellen McArthur Foundation). This requires a fundamental shift from the ‘take, make, dispose’ model to a more sustainable system where materials are reused, repaired, refurbished, and remanufactured. The approach not only addresses environmental concerns but also supports sustainable economic growth by reducing reliance on imports and optimising resource productivity. Roadmaps provide a strategic framework to guide stakeholders in implementing circular economy (CE) principles, helping to ensure that the transition to a low-carbon future is both environmentally sustainable and economically resilient. Much attention has been given to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for use in electric vehicles (EVs) because of the importance of the car manufacturing industry to the UK. The battery is the most obvious and largest new component in an EV, with key raw materials, notably lithium and cobalt designated as critical minerals (see below). If materials from overseas are at risk, trying to make better use of the materials we already have in circulation is an obvious strategy. A circular economy is particularly crucial for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), given their pivotal role in powering electronic devices, electric vehicles (EVs), and energy storage systems. LIBs contain several critical metals, including lithium, cobalt, nickel, and manganese, which are essential for their functionality but also pose significant supply security, environmental, and geopolitical challenges. The UK’s commitment to phasing out combustion engine vehicle sales by 2030 or 2035 further underscores the importance of LIBs in meeting national net-zero targets.

Met4Tech Circular Economy Roadmap Report for Rare Earth Elements (REE) in Permanent Magnets

  • The UKRI Interdisciplinary Centre for a Circular Economy in Technology Metals
This report is produced by the UKRI Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Centre for Technology Metals (Met4Tech.org). It describes important considerations about developing a circular economy (CE) roadmap for the Rare Earth Elements (REE) in permanent magnets in the UK. REE are used in key applications such as wind turbines for renewable energy, traction motors for electric mobility, and electronics. This report addresses the specific challenges and opportunities presented by the REE magnet sector in the UK and globally. The set of messages draws on best practices and insights from existing CE strategies developed through stakeholder consultations and new interdisciplinary research across the whole magnet value chain in the Met4Tech Centre. Roadmaps provide a strategic framework to guide stakeholders in implementing CE principles, ensuring that the transition to a low-carbon future is both environmentally sustainable and economically resilient. The development of this CE roadmap for REE magnets has involved deep dives, value chain analysis, stocks and flows modelling, stakeholder engagement, roadmapping workshops, and writing sprints. Met4Tech is part of the National Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Research (NICER) programme and collaborated with the CE-Hub to engage a wider group of stakeholders to lever joint understanding to address the main ‘pain points’ that inhibit security of supply and circularity in the value chain. The CE-Hub is using the results to develop a more conceptual framework, whilst the Met4Tech team are looking at the specific uses of REE in the UK (EV mobility, wind power, etc.) to develop the tech metals Roadmap for UK government decision makers. The Met4Tech Centre has also created a ‘UK Technology Metals Observatory’ at the British Geological Survey (BGS) for primary and secondary technology metals, with information on key products, metals and flows. This provides an introduction and case examples of Rare Earth Elements used in Magnets: see techmetalsobservatory.org The Met4Tech Centre has close association with the Critical Minerals Intelligence Centre (CMIC) at the BGS. The CMIC team have prepared Foresight reports on key technologies, such as Wind power. Other resources and publications about Rare Earth Elements in the magnet value chain are provided at the end of this report, and on the Met4Tech website: see met4tech.org/resources

Doing Cold Smarter: Innovation Roadmap

  • Accompanying the University of Birmingham Policy Commission
    "Doing Cold Smarter"
  • Chair: Lord Robin Teverson
  • Lead Academics: Professor Toby Peters ⬥ Professor Martin Freer
  • Commissioners: Jonathan Radcliffe ⬥Lenny Koh ⬥ Tim Benton ⬥ Dinah McLeod ⬥ Sally Uren ⬥ Rob Elliot ⬥ Peter Fryer ⬥ Pete Braithwaite ⬥ David Sanders ⬥ Clive Hickman ⬥ Nick Winser
  • Policy Commission Editor: David Strahan
  • Policy Commission Manager: Gavin Harper
Cold has been much neglected in the energy debate. Governments are developing strategies and policies to green everything from electricity to transport to heat, but the energy and environmental impacts of cooling have so far been largely ignored. This is a serious oversight, since making things cold is energy intensive and can be highly polluting, and demand for cooling in all its forms is booming worldwide – especially in developing countries. According to one projection, by the end of this century global demand for air conditioning alone could consume the equivalent of half our worldwide electricity generation today – and most of the increase will come in developing markets. The ‘greening’ of cold is clearly an urgent global problem – but it may also offer Britain a massive business opportunity. Cold may have been ignored but is vitally important to many aspects of modern life. An effective cold chain, for example, is essential for tackling problems such as food waste, food security, water conservation and public health. Cooling is also critical for many less obvious but essential functions: data centres couldn’t operate without it, nor for example MRI scanners in medicine or superconductors in power electronics. Cooling also provides modern levels of comfort in hot countries – and can make the difference between some regions being habitable or not. At the same time, vast amounts of cold are wasted – for instance during the regasification of LNG – which could in principle be recycled to satisfy some of this demand and start to reduce the environmental damage caused by cooling. Such a system-level approach – which starts by asking what energy services we need, and what is the least damaging way to provide them, rather than accepting existing practices as a fait accompli – has recently been coined the ‘Cold Economy’. It is clear the Cold Economy could unleash a wide range of innovative clean cold technologies and provide energy resilience, economic growth and environmental benefits, but there is an urgent need to develop a system-level analysis of this problem and the potential solutions to inform both industry and policymakers. The Birmingham Policy Commission: Doing Cold Smarter was convened to start this work.



Share This Page